Mcfall, we need to talk.

So I was thinking, earlier, that the only good thing about blogging and the like is to be able to fully explore an idea before you are interrupted. You won't lose a train of thought in order to answer someone's tangential statement or question. And if someone misquotes your argument because they stopped listening in order to form their reply: you've got it in writing and can send them the link.

We rarely argue, in fact all of our falling-outs seem to just send us flying in opposite directions instead of arguing. But for the sake of an experiment: let's have one. On the blog.

Not like an angry argument, but like a friendly debate.


So we now have to find something we disagree on and write blog/arguments back and forth on it.

Here's your mission: think of a list of things in the name of which we can take up honestly dissimilar stances. Anyone who chooses to may also suggest subjects.

After thinking about it:

• Catholic Homosexuality- cross to bear within the confines of dogma, or a kind of union that should be included within the Church?
• Freud: The man with the plan, or the man with a hand down his pants?

• Those Horrible Phelps Nuts: necessary evil or me and Leviticus say burn 'em

I love clever titles. It's one of the few reasons I like fall out boy and Panic!

Bye-o.
Juno-hu